If you have already beaten the original, then Below Zero will give you a similar but new experience. Below Zero has a smaller world to explore but it is more densely packed.īoth games are great. Below Zero has zero pop-in and performs better in general.īoth games have plenty of cool locations to explore and things to do. The environments in the original game suffered from serious texture pop-in as a result of the way the game was programmed. in the original yes you had to x y and z location but those locations were interesting. all there was to do in subzero was go to x y and z location. Sound like the game didn't sit well with your rig.(that would explain the stalker teeth) Stalker Teeth consistently fell through the world. The last fourth of the game dragged on and on. Many of the biomes had nothing of interest or reason to ever visit them. This is a good example of how ridiculous people are. That said, it still has a few issues but if you enjoyed Subnautica, I'm not sure why you wouldn't also enjoy Sub Zero. Sub Zero is basically an improvement in almost every conceivable way. It's definitely a case of rose-tinted glasses with the original. I couldn't even bring myself to finish it. Within the last few weeks, I played (and completed) Sub Zero, then went back and played the original again and. I had played (and beaten) Subnautica awhile back and liked it, but had some issues with it. It's actually probably better than the original Subnautica. Originally posted by Vesperas:It's not bad at all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |